Hickman's cage-free, eco-friendly changes egged on by changing consumer preferences
When California was considering its restrictions on cages in 2008 and 2010, early research showed some consumers willing to pay a premium for the eggs that surpassed the extra cost to producers, says Timothy Richards, professor of agribusiness.
If chickens could talk, they'd probably say they like living cage-free better. Major retailers and breakfast-centered restaurants prefer cage-free eggs, too — to please their affluent customers. The higher prices, however, may be a challenge for low-income consumers, according to Professor of Agribusiness Timothy Richards.
In this post on azcentral.com on Sept. 15, 2017:
Research shows it can cost 20 to 40 percent more to produce cage-free eggs, Richards said, depending on how well a particular farm runs its operations.
"There are welfare effects. It is incredibly regressive because it is the less wealthy people who would have bought the Walmart battery (cage) produced eggs, but wealthier people who demand cage free."
Latest news
- A connection that began at W. P. Carey comes full circle
W. P. Carey Cupids Maura Scott and Martin Mende return as faculty.
- Hobbs wants a bigger share of Arizona sports gambling revenue. Is that feasible?
An ASU marketing expert weighs in on the potential impacts of increasing sports betting taxes.…
- The hobby effect: Why showing your personal side can pay off professionally
A new study finds that sharing hobbies tied to growth and fulfillment can make people appear…